Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6688
Title: Differences in Rhetorical and Refutational Argument Complexity by Grade Level
Authors: Cavera, Veronica
El-Moslimany, Hebbah
Duncan, Ravit
Chinn, Clark
Keywords: Learning and Identity
Issue Date: Jun-2020
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)
Citation: Cavera, V., El-Moslimany, H., Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. (2020). Differences in Rhetorical and Refutational Argument Complexity by Grade Level. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 1 (pp. 533-536). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: Engaging students in argumentation encourages a productive understanding of scientific knowledge. In order to investigate arguments at different grade levels, we present a comparison of arguments from 7th and 11th grade biology students from similarly structured modeling assessments using an argumentation framework. We note that while students at both levels constructed arguments, differences arose in the kinds of rhetorical statements and refutational strategies. We discuss these differences in conjunction with scaffolding and implications for design.
URI: https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2020.533
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6688
Appears in Collections:ICLS 2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
533-536.pdf204.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.