Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Secondary Students’ Evaluation of Inappropriate Strategies of Reasoning about Evidence under a Scientific Explanation|
van Aalst, Jan
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS].|
|Citation:||Ma, G., van Aalst, J., Chan, C., & Wang, J. (2018). Secondary Students’ Evaluation of Inappropriate Strategies of Reasoning about Evidence under a Scientific Explanation. In Kay, J. and Luckin, R. (Eds.) Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 1. London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||This study explored potential factors that could affect the development of students’ strategies for evaluating scientific evidence. Thirty-six students from Grade 7 were asked to evaluate the evidence from an investigation involving force and motion. They were shown three inappropriate responses to reasoning about that evidence. They were then asked to evaluate these responses against an informational text that conveyed the scientific explanation with Galileo’s thought experiment. Participants’ verbal responses to reasoning about the inappropriate responses to the informational text were transcribed and analysed qualitatively. We found three factors that influenced strategy development: the students 1) kept the conflict between the competing claims of the domain unresolved, 2) doubted the validity of the inference from the thought experiment and 3) mistakenly assessed the plausibility of the competing claims. Implications for explaining the development of reasoning about scientific evidence and for instruction are discussed.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2018|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.