Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Common Ground and Individual Accountability in Literature Selection of Groups: Three Different Group Learning Techniques|
Hesse, Friedrich W.
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS].|
|Citation:||Schubert, M., Buder, J., Rädle, R., & Hesse, F. W. (2015). Common Ground and Individual Accountability in Literature Selection of Groups: Three Different Group Learning Techniques In Lindwall, O., Häkkinen, P., Koschman, T. Tchounikine, P. Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.) (2015). Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2015, Volume 2. Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Libraries heavily changed over the last decades, supporting more and more the collaborative learner in providing adapted spaces and technologies. The transformation seems not surprising, as group learning is generally considered to be better than individual learning, although the mechanism behind is still unclear. In a single factor experiment with 180 students, 3-person groups jointly selected research literature for a Geology course at a Multitouch Tabletop. Based on the notions of common ground and individual accountability one third of the groups performed the task collaboratively. Another third had a preceding cooperative stage involving a division of labor, whereas the remaining third of groups had a preceding “parallel” stage. Results indicate a significant difference in learning achievements favoring the parallel condition. The results are discussed in the context of learning environments in libraries.|
|Appears in Collections:||CSCL 2015|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.