Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Justification of Socioscientific Claims as the Basis for Assessing Argumentation|
|Authors:||Sadler, Troy D.|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences|
|Citation:||Sadler, T. D. (2006). Justification of Socioscientific Claims as the Basis for Assessing Argumentation. In Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., & Hickey, D. T. (Eds.), The International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Indiana University 2006. Proceedings of ICLS 2006, Volume 2 (pp. 978-979). Bloomington, Indiana, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||This investigation introduces a novel rubric for the assessment of argumentation quality relative to socioscientific issues and presents results from a field test of its application. Forty-five students participated in interviews designed to elicit socioscientific argumentation regarding genetic engineering issues. A five point rubric was developed to assess how well individuals justified the claims they advanced. Implications for the use of this tool for advancing research agendas in the learning sciences will be discussed.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2006|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.