Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Thinking Hard Together: the Long and Short of Collaborative Idea Generation in Scientific Inquiry
Authors: Wang, Hao-Chuan
Rose, Carolyn
Cui, Yue
Chang, Chun-Yen
Huang, Chun-Chieh
Li, and Tsai-Yen
Issue Date: Jul-2007
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Citation: Wang, H., Rose, C., Cui, Y., Chang, C., Huang, C., & Li, a. (2007). Thinking Hard Together: the Long and Short of Collaborative Idea Generation in Scientific Inquiry. In Chinn, C. A., Erkens, G., & Puntambekar, S. (Eds.), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007, Volume 8, Part 2 (pp. 753-762). New Brunswick, NJ, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: Idea generation is a cognitive process that plays a central role in inquiry learning tasks. This paper presents results from a controlled experiment in which we investigate the affect on productivity and learning from doing idea generation tasks individually versus in pairs, with versus without automatic support from a virtual brainstorming agent called VIBRANT. Our finding is that individuals brainstorming with VIBRANT produced more ideas than individuals who brainstormed with a human peer. However, an additional finding is that while brainstorming in pairs lead to short term process losses in terms of idea generation, with a corresponding reduction in learning in terms of pre to post test gains, it produced a productivity gain for a subsequent distinct individual inquiry task. Furthermore, automatically generated feedback from VIBRANT improved learning during idea generation but did not mitigate the process losses that were associated with reduced learning in the pairs conditions.
Appears in Collections:CSCL 2007

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
753-762.pdf181.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.