Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Students’ Analysis of Multiple Sources for Agreements and Disagreements|
Lawless, Kimberly A.
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.|
|Citation:||Manning, F., Goldman, S., Ozuru, Y., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K., & Braasch, J. (2008). Students’ Analysis of Multiple Sources for Agreements and Disagreements. In Kanselaar, G., Jonker, V., Kirschner, P. A., & Prins, F. J. (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Volumes 2 (pp. 19-26). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Students analyzed the similarities (agreements) and differences (disagreements) between a set of two sources regarding why the authors thought Chicago had become a big city. The data we discuss provide descriptive information on three aspects of students' responses: (1) the response strategies they used, (2) how they would characterize agreement and disagreement across two sources, and (3) the rhetorical form of their written responses. Students' responses for Agree were more consistent than those to Disagree and, as expected, were related to the specific sources they compared.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2008|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.