Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Learning in mathematics: Effects of procedural and conceptual instruction on the quality of student interaction|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)|
|Citation:||Diziol, D., Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Haug, S. (2010). Learning in mathematics: Effects of procedural and conceptual instruction on the quality of student interaction. In Gomez, K., Lyons, L., & Radinsky, J. (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) - Volume 2, Short Papers, Symposia, and Selected Abstracts (pp. 370-371). Chicago IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Quantitative analyses from our previous research indicated that collaboration is more effective when learning with conceptual instruction than when learning with procedural instruction. To explain this differential effect, we analyzed student interaction during instruction. First analyses show that the conceptual instruction elicited more fruitful interaction behavior than the procedural instruction. Furthermore, in the procedural condition, students more often split potential learning opportunities between each other, yielding decreased practice opportunities.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2010|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.