Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Characterizing a New Dimension of Change in Attending and Responding to the Substance of Student Thinking|
|Publisher:||Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences|
|Citation:||Richards, J., Elby, A., & Gupta, A. (2014). Characterizing a New Dimension of Change in Attending and Responding to the Substance of Student Thinking. In Joseph L. Polman, Eleni A. Kyza, D. Kevin O'Neill, Iris Tabak, William R. Penuel, A. Susan Jurow, Kevin O'Connor, Tiffany Lee, and Laura D'Amico (Eds.). Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014. Volume 1. Colorado, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 286-293.|
|Abstract:||"Responsive teaching," in which teachers attend and respond to the substance of students' ideas, is central to facilitating student learning through engagement in authentic disciplinary practices. In characterizing teachers' progress toward greater responsiveness, researchers typically code teachers' attention as shifting toward the intellectual content (substance) of students' ideas and away from other foci such as students' correctness. These schemes, however, do not distinguish between different aspects of the substance of students' ideas. In this paper, we argue that a science teacher, Mr. S, demonstrates progress not by shifting toward greater attention to "substance," but rather by shifting in the facet of student thinking to which he primarily attends and responds. He shifts toward attending to causal stories (mechanistic explanations) and away from causal factors (potentially relevant variables). We argue that such shifts toward more sophisticated epistemic practices should be targets of professional development and of the assessment of responsive teaching.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS2014|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.