Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Knowledge Organization with Multiple External Representations for Socioscientific Argumentation: A Case on Nuclear Energy|
|Publisher:||Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences|
|Citation:||Namdar, B. & Shen, J. (2014). Knowledge Organization with Multiple External Representations for Socioscientific Argumentation: A Case on Nuclear Energy. In Joseph L. Polman, Eleni A. Kyza, D. Kevin O'Neill, Iris Tabak, William R. Penuel, A. Susan Jurow, Kevin O'Connor, Tiffany Lee, and Laura D'Amico (Eds.). Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014. Volume 1. Colorado, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 254-261.|
|Abstract:||Given the vast amount of information readily available through the Internet in different forms of representation, learners need to organize their knowledge strategically in order to make a sound argument, especially on a complex topic such as socioscientific issues. In this study, we designed a science unit on nuclear energy using a newly developed online knowledge and learning management system that offers three types of representations: pictorial, textual, and concept maps. We investigated how learners organized their knowledge with multiple external representations and how their knowledge organization practices interacted with their argumentation. Our results indicated that concept maps and wiki entries were more connected than the pictorial modes in the network of knowledge entries created by the learners. Moreover, we found evidence showing that students' knowledge organization enabled them to draw information while arguing and that their argumentation guided them to advance their knowledge organization practices.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS2014|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.