Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/11097
Title: | Representational Politics in the Learning Sciences: Foundations, Limits, and Alternatives |
Authors: | Uttamchandani, Suraj Vea, Tanner Curnow, Joe Scipio, Déana |
Keywords: | Learning Sciences |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Publisher: | International Society of the Learning Sciences |
Citation: | Uttamchandani, S., Vea, T., Curnow, J., & Scipio, D. (2024). Representational Politics in the Learning Sciences: Foundations, Limits, and Alternatives. In Lindgren, R., Asino, T. I., Kyza, E. A., Looi, C. K., Keifert, D. T., & Suárez, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2024 (pp. 266-273). International Society of the Learning Sciences. |
Abstract: | In this conceptual paper we interrogate the use and misuse of representational politics within the learning sciences community, including our research, our professional society, and our departments. We argue that representational politics are a necessary but insufficient strategy for advancing equity and justice, and that in many cases they act as a detour that moves us away from more impactful strategies to address harm. To do this, we outline the philosophical underpinnings of representational politics and work through the limitations of these strategies when implemented in our field. We argue that the learning sciences should focus equity and justice strategies around collective liberation approaches rooted in historicized analysis of power and a commitment to solidarity. |
Description: | Long Paper |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2024.106002 https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/11097 |
Appears in Collections: | ISLS Annual Meeting 2024 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ICLS2024_266-273.pdf | 374.87 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.