Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/7477
Title: Distributed Argumentation for Politicization in an Activist Campaign
Authors: Curnow, Joe
Keywords: Learning Sciences
Issue Date: Jun-2021
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences
Citation: Curnow, J. (2021). Distributed Argumentation for Politicization in an Activist Campaign. In de Vries, E., Hod, Y., & Ahn, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021. (pp. 275-282). Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: The paper analyzes the emergent practice of distributed argumentation in an environmentalist campaign. I argue that distributed argumentation was a sense-making process spread across participants as they iteratively, interactively articulated political rationales, with speakers alternating and building on their colleague’s contributions. This practice emerged as both a collaborative practice of intentionally supporting colleagues’ concept development, as well as an oppositional practice that sought to combat more conservative colleagues by affirming peers they identified with and expanding on their argument. Theorizing distributed argumentation contributes to studies of democratic education and argumentation by exploring the interactional learning that happens beyond classrooms to build skill in engaging in democratic debate and politicization.
URI: https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2021.275
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/7477
Appears in Collections:ISLS Annual Meeting 2021

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
275-282.pdf366.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.