Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/4484
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBichler, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Sonya
dc.contributor.authorHasenbein, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorLinn, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-10T13:52:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-10T20:03:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-10T13:52:04Z
dc.date.available2020-06-10T20:03:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationBichler, S., Richards, S., Hasenbein, L., Linn, M., & Fischer, F. (2019). Understanding Climate Change Through Collaborative Versus Individual Inquiry With Constructive or Example-Based Scaffolds. In Lund, K., Niccolai, G. P., Lavoué, E., Hmelo-Silver, C., Gweon, G., & Baker, M. (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019, Volume 2 (pp. 668-671). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.dx.org/10.22318/cscl2019.668
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.isls.org//handle/1/4484-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated a constructive and an example-based scaffold when learning from dynamic visualizations about climate change. Learners collaboratively or individually generated a diagram that represented energy flow (constructive scaffold) or observed a peer learner generating the diagram (example-based scaffold). We hypothesized that collaborative learners would benefit more from the constructive than the example-based scaffold, but that the opposite would be the case for individual learners. Seventy-one university students were randomly allocated to conditions in the 2X2 between-subjects design. Climate change understanding was measured at pre- and posttest. Preliminary results supported our hypothesis. We conclude that the constructive scaffold elicited questions that led to deep engagement in the collaborative condition, resulting in better understanding. Individual learners possibly failed to recognize crucial concepts in the constructive condition because they had questions but nobody to discuss with. They profited more from the example-based scaffold which emphasized central concepts of climate change.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Climate Change Through Collaborative Versus Individual Inquiry With Constructive or Example-Based Scaffoldsen_US
dc.typeShort Papersen_US
Appears in Collections:CSCL 2019

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
668-671.pdf190.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.