Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Real Arguments about a Virtual Epidemic: Conversations and Contestations in a Tween Gaming Club|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.|
|Citation:||Kafai, Y. & Wong, J. (2008). Real Arguments about a Virtual Epidemic: Conversations and Contestations in a Tween Gaming Club. In Kanselaar, G., Jonker, V., Kirschner, P. A., & Prins, F. J. (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Volume 1 (pp. 414-421). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Recent studies have examined how argumentation around science is positioned and used in everyday interactions. Our research extends these investigations into a virtual world called Whyville.net and its annual outbreak of Whypox, a virtual epidemic. We observed and recorded players' conversations and contestations about Whypox in an after school gaming club. We found that club members' argumentation involved the use of warrants, rebuttals, and data as found in other studies of everyday argumentation. Players also developed different theories, some unwarranted, about the causes and spread of Whypox, and used the epidemic to position themselves as insiders. In our discussion, we address ways in which virtual epidemics connect to on-going research on everyday argumentation and provide starting points for students' learning about infectious diseases.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2008|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.