Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/2462
Title: The Role of Argumentation for Domain-Specific Knowledge Gains in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A Meta-Analysis
Authors: Wecker, Christof
Fischer, Frank
Issue Date: Jun-2011
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences
Citation: Wecker, C. & Fischer, F. (2011). The Role of Argumentation for Domain-Specific Knowledge Gains in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A Meta-Analysis. In Spada, H., Stahl, G., Miyake, N., & Law, N. (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings. Volume I — Long Papers (pp. 304-311). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: The meta-analysis reported in this paper investigated the role of the quality of argumentation for domain-specific knowledge gains in computer-supported collaborative learning settings. Given the scarcity of primary studies that report correlations between these two variables, a meta-regression approach was used that uses interventions' effects on argumentation to predict their effects on domain-specific knowledge. Effect sizes for 17 comparisons extracted from 12 studies were included in the analysis using a random-effects model. On average, the interventions have a small to moderate effect on argumentation. With respect to the relation of their effects on argumentation to their effects on domain-specific knowledge, no unequivocal picture emerges. These findings call into question the broadly shared theoretical assumption that argumentation can be a mechanism that mediates the effects of interventions on domain-specific knowledge. A set of recommendations for strengthening future research on the topic is presented.
URI: https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/cscl2011.304
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/2462
Appears in Collections:CSCL 2011

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
304-311.pdf226.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.