Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Misunderstandings of Teachers Applying ICAP Theory into Practice|
|Keywords:||Teaching and Teacher Learning|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)|
|Citation:||Ha, J., Su, M., Chi, M., & Cullicott, C. (2020). Misunderstandings of Teachers Applying ICAP Theory into Practice. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 4 (pp. 2407-2408). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) is a theory of learning that differentiates students’ engagement primarily on behavior. ICAP postulates that interactive engagement is superior for learning than constructive engagement. Both exceed the benefits of active or passive engagement. This paper discusses misconceptions of teachers during a 5-year project that attempted to translate ICAP into instruction. Teachers displayed mixed success in implementing the ICAP framework. Teachers successfully implemented active mode but struggled to design appropriate constructive or interactive lessons.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2020|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.