Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6352
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeifert, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorHall, Rogers
dc.contributor.authorEnyedy, Noel
dc.contributor.authorVogelstein, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorPierson, Ashlyn
dc.contributor.authorEhrenfeld, Nadav
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorMcGugan, Katherine Schneeberger
dc.contributor.authorMarin, Ananda
dc.contributor.authorFaulstich, Elisa Noemí Orellana
dc.contributor.authorBordeaux, Clementine
dc.contributor.authorClark, Heather
dc.contributor.authorGravell, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Lindsay
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Denise
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Lilia
dc.contributor.authorEyes, Renee White
dc.contributor.authorFlood, Virginia J.
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Geetanshi
dc.contributor.authorDeLiema, David
dc.contributor.authorValerie, Jesslyn
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Sihan
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Chi
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xuehui
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Brette
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Michael Sean
dc.contributor.authorHarrer, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorClark, Douglas
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T23:53:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T04:29:12Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-08T23:53:48Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T04:29:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationKeifert, D., Hall, R., Enyedy, N., Vogelstein, L., Pierson, A., Ehrenfeld, N., Marshall, S., McGugan, K. S., Marin, A., Faulstich, E. N., Bordeaux, C., Clark, H., Gravell, J., Lindberg, L., Morales, D., Rodriguez, L., Eyes, R. W., Flood, V. J., Sharma, G., DeLiema, D., Valerie, J., Cabrera, A., Smith, S., Xiao, S., Xiao, C., Wang, X., Garner, B., Smith, M. S., Harrer, B., & Clark, D. (2020). Analytical Designs: Goodwin’s Substrates as a Tool for Studying Learning. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 3 (pp. 1471-1478). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2020.1471
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6352-
dc.description.abstractCharles Goodwin’s legacy includes a multitude of analytical tools for examining meaning making in interaction. We focus on Goodwin’s substrate—“the local, public configuration of action and semiotic resources” available in interaction used to create shared meanings (Goodwin, 2018, p. 32), gathering early career scholars to explore how research designs adapt substrate as an analytical tool for education research in diverse settings. This structured poster session examines how substrate can be used to capture a complex web of learning phenomena and support important analytical shifts, including representing learning processes, privileging members’ phenomena to address issues of equity, and understanding shifting power relations through multi-layered and multi-scaled analyses.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)en_US
dc.subjectDesignen_US
dc.titleAnalytical Designs: Goodwin’s Substrates as a Tool for Studying Learningen_US
dc.typeSymposiumen_US
Appears in Collections:ICLS 2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
1471-1478.pdf398.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.