Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Analytical Designs: Goodwin’s Substrates as a Tool for Studying Learning|
McGugan, Katherine Schneeberger
Faulstich, Elisa Noemí Orellana
Eyes, Renee White
Flood, Virginia J.
Smith, Michael Sean
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)|
|Citation:||Keifert, D., Hall, R., Enyedy, N., Vogelstein, L., Pierson, A., Ehrenfeld, N., Marshall, S., McGugan, K. S., Marin, A., Faulstich, E. N., Bordeaux, C., Clark, H., Gravell, J., Lindberg, L., Morales, D., Rodriguez, L., Eyes, R. W., Flood, V. J., Sharma, G., DeLiema, D., Valerie, J., Cabrera, A., Smith, S., Xiao, S., Xiao, C., Wang, X., Garner, B., Smith, M. S., Harrer, B., & Clark, D. (2020). Analytical Designs: Goodwin’s Substrates as a Tool for Studying Learning. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 3 (pp. 1471-1478). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Charles Goodwin’s legacy includes a multitude of analytical tools for examining meaning making in interaction. We focus on Goodwin’s substrate—“the local, public configuration of action and semiotic resources” available in interaction used to create shared meanings (Goodwin, 2018, p. 32), gathering early career scholars to explore how research designs adapt substrate as an analytical tool for education research in diverse settings. This structured poster session examines how substrate can be used to capture a complex web of learning phenomena and support important analytical shifts, including representing learning processes, privileging members’ phenomena to address issues of equity, and understanding shifting power relations through multi-layered and multi-scaled analyses.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2020|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.