Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/3632
Title: Nurses' Informal Argument: Learning to Justify the Claim and Reach Agreement
Authors: Hagler, Debra
Brem, Sarah
Issue Date: Jun-2006
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences
Citation: Hagler, D. & Brem, S. (2006). Nurses' Informal Argument: Learning to Justify the Claim and Reach Agreement. In Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., & Hickey, D. T. (Eds.), The International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Indiana University 2006. Proceedings of ICLS 2006, Volume 2 (pp. 932-933). Bloomington, Indiana, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.
URI: https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2006.932
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/3632
Appears in Collections:ICLS 2006

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
932-933.pdf118.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.