Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Effects of Representational Guidance during Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.|
|Citation:||Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). Effects of Representational Guidance during Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In Kanselaar, G., Jonker, V., Kirschner, P. A., & Prins, F. J. (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Volumes 3 (pp. 47-48). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||This research investigated the role of representational guidance during the construction of argumentative diagrams. We used a design that compared two tools that differed with respect to the representational guidance they offered: The Graphical Debate-tool offered more guidance than the Textual Debate-tool. The results show that groups that worked with the Graphical Debate-tool constructed representations of higher quality, wrote better essays, and performed better on a knowledge post-test.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2008|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.