Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Learning from Complex Cognitive Tasks: Comparing Groups to Individuals
Authors: Kirschner, Femke
Paas, Fred
Kirschner, Paul
Issue Date: Jun-2008
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Citation: Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. (2008). Learning from Complex Cognitive Tasks: Comparing Groups to Individuals. In Kanselaar, G., Jonker, V., Kirschner, P. A., & Prins, F. J. (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Volume 1 (pp. 446-452). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: The effects of individual versus group learning (in triads) on efficiency of retention and transfer test performance in the domain of biology (heredity) among 70 high-school students were investigated. Applying cognitive load theory, the limitations of the working memory capacity at the individual level were considered an important reason to assign complex learning tasks to groups rather than to individuals. It was hypothesized that groups will have more processing capacity available for relating the information elements to each other and by doing so for constructing higher quality cognitive schemata than individuals if the high cognitive load imposed by complex learning tasks could be shared among group members. In contrast, it was expected that individuals who learn from carrying out the same complex tasks would need all available processing capacity for remembering the interrelated information elements, and, consequently, would not be able to allocate resources to working with them. This interaction hypothesis was confirmed by the data on efficiency of retention and transfer test performance; there was a favorable relationship between mental effort and retention test performance for the individual learners as opposed to a favorable relationship between transfer test performance and mental effort for the students who learned in groups.
Appears in Collections:ICLS 2008

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
446-452.pdf236.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.