Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||From Visualization to Logical Necessity Through Argumentative Design|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)|
|Citation:||Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2010). From Visualization to Logical Necessity Through Argumentative Design. In Gomez, K., Lyons, L., & Radinsky, J. (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) - Volume 2, Short Papers, Symposia, and Selected Abstracts (pp. 415-416). Chicago IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||We show that a meticulous design can encourage students in dyads to shift from informal reasoning (visual, inquiry-based) to reasoning moved by logical necessity (abductive and deductive). We describe a case study in which one dyad solves a series activities purposely designed. We show that argumentation first relies on intuition, and then intertwines the activities of conjecturing and checking the conjectures though the use of different gestures.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2010|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.