Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Technological affordances for productive multivocality in analysis
Authors: Dyke, Gregory
Lund, Kristine
Jeong, Heisawn
Medina, Richard
Suthers, Daniel D.
van Aalst, Jan
Chen, Wenli
Looi, Chee-Kit
Issue Date: Jun-2011
Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences
Citation: Dyke, G., Lund, K., Jeong, H., Medina, R., Suthers, D. D., van Aalst, J., Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2011). Technological affordances for productive multivocality in analysis. In Spada, H., Stahl, G., Miyake, N., & Law, N. (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings. Volume I — Long Papers (pp. 454-461). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Abstract: Productive multivocality in CSCL has been the focus of a series of workshops involving the comparison and contrasting of multiple analyses of the same datasets, with the goal of learning how different epistemologies and analysis methods of collaborative learning can complement each other and allow a more complete understanding to emerge. A prerequisite to such work is the technological ability to assist the comparison of different analyses. In this paper, we show how the Tatiana framework for manipulating analytic representations was used to compare three different analyses of a computer-mediated small group problem solving session. In particular, we draw conclusions as to the technological affordances that are needed to ensure productive multivocality and illustrate the immediate benefits provided by the Tatiana framework.
Appears in Collections:CSCL 2011

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
454-461.pdf639.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.