Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Navigating through Controversial Online Discussions: The Influence of Visualized Ratings|
|Publisher:||International Society of the Learning Sciences|
|Citation:||Buder, J., Schwind, C., Rudat, A., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Navigating through Controversial Online Discussions: The Influence of Visualized Ratings. In Rummel, N., Kapur, M., Nathan, M., & Puntambekar, S. (Eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 — Full Papers & Symposia (pp. 65-72). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||Awareness tools using visualized ratings of other people can help recipients to find their way in crowded information spaces. This article reports on a laboratory experiment that investigates how the design of an awareness tool impacts the navigation behavior of recipients within an online discussion forum. In the experiment, 127 participants read through a forum discussion for which posts were rated by average agreement and average quality. Depending on the experimental condition, posts were visualized along continua indicating average agreement ratings (absent vs. present) and/or average quality ratings (absent vs. present). It was hypothesized that an agreement visualization will increase the salience of both high- agreement and low-agreement posts, whereas a quality visualization will only increase the salience of high-quality posts. Measuring reading times for discussion posts, these hypotheses could be confirmed. However, neither recipients' attitude strength nor recall of discussion arguments was affected.|
|Appears in Collections:||CSCL 2013|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.