Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||How Do We Assess Equity in Programming Pairs?|
Shapiro, R. Benjamin
|Publisher:||Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences|
|Citation:||Deitrick, E., Shapiro, R. B., & Gravel, B. (2016). How Do We Assess Equity in Programming Pairs? In Looi, C. K., Polman, J. L., Cress, U., and Reimann, P. (Eds.). Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, Volume 1. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.|
|Abstract:||We comparatively apply methods for assessing equity to find ways that allow us to better interrogate, describe, and understand the construct’s complexities. To do so, we replicate prior work assessing equity in programming pairs (Lewis & Shah, 2015; Shah, Lewis, & Caires, 2014) by creating distributions of coded (1) computer use, (2) turns of talk, and (3) questions and commands; furthermore we build upon their application by (4) examining students’ embodied interaction and social positioning. Using these four methods to analyze the discourse of a pair of students programming, we identified numerous examples of positioning shifts, and see how inequities could potentially emerge through discursive mechanisms. We then reflect on what each of these four different methods foreground, their strengths and shortcomings, including their sensitivity to time-scope and pedagogy, and triangulate the quantified and qualitative results.|
|Appears in Collections:||ICLS 2016|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.